Muller v Mazda


Our clients leased a new 2016 Mazda CX-9 UT-SG-XA on May 29, 2016. The car was leased through Riverside Metro Auto Group LLC, in Riverside.

The 2016 Mazda CX-9 was covered by Mazda Motor of America, Inc.’s 3 year / 36,000 mile bumper-to-bumper warranty, and a 5 year / 60,000 mile powertrain warranty. Our clients allege that their Mazda CX-9 contained and/or developed serious safety related defects and so they took it to Riverside Mazda, a Mazda authorized repair facility, to be repaired.

Riverside Mazda confirmed the safety problem our clients were experiencing, and even wrote down that “ . . . car did act up as customer described . . . accelerating from a stop the car froze at one RPM when driving at about 65 MPH. Car instantly lost power and slowed almost to a stop.”

Our clients allege that despite the verification of the defect, Mazda Riverside was unable to locate the cause of the defect and repair it. Despite the dangerous and unsafe nature of the defect, Mazda instructed its repair facility not to undertake any repair attempts, but simply to give the car back to them. Our clients further allege Mazda failed to comply with its warranty obligations and that their Mazda CX-9 remains defective.

Our clients hired the law firm of Rosner, Barry and Babbitt to fight Mazda. It does not matter whether you bought a Mazda lemon or are leasing a Mazda lemon the Auto Fraud Legal Center can help. The law firm of Rosner, Barry & Babbitt not only handles auto fraud cases, but Lemon Law cases. Our goal in automobile Lemon Law is to get you out of your car, get you your money back, have your loan paid off by the warrantor, and have the warrantor pay the attorneys’ fees and costs. If you purchased any vehicle which you believe to be a lemon (whether it is new or used) please contact Our office will provide you with a FREE evaluation of your lemon law situation.