2016 – 2017 TOYOTA TACOMA MAYBE LEAKING DIFFERENTIAL FLUID AND UNSAFE TO DRIVE

TOYOTA DIFFERENTIAL ISSUE

2016 – 2017 TOYOTA TACOMA MAYBE LEAKING DIFFERENTIAL FLUID AND UNSAFE TO DRIVE

On April 27, 2017, Toyota Motors Sales filed a Defect report with the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration (NHTSA) disclosing a safety defect in the 2016 – 2017 Toyota Tacoma. The rear differential may leak fluid.

The rear differential enables you to drive safely down the road, and cannot function properly without fluid. Toyota stated that 2016 – 2017 Toyota Tacoma trucks should not be driven until any leaking differential is repaired.

You may have received a letter from Toyota in June related to the leaking rear differential. However, Toyota does not have parts to repair the rear differential on the Toyota Tacoma. We understand that Toyota dealers are holding Toyota Tacoma trucks on their lots – sometimes for several months – until the repair can be performed.

If you own a 2016 – 2017 Toyota Tacoma, please contact Auto Fraud Legal Center for a free evaluation of your rights. We are here to help you! We have been representing consumers in California for over thirty years.

Learn More

Your Dodge Ram 2500 may not be able to pass a SMOG Test

Your Dodge Ram 2500 may not be able to pass a SMOG Test. Without a valid SMOG certificate, you cannot register your truck. Dodge has issued Emissions Recall S87 that attempts to fix this known problem. However, it seems that not all Dodge Ram 2500 trucks are able to pass a SMOG Test even after the recall repair is performed. The 6.7L Cummins turbo diesel engine may continue to release air pollutants that exceed federal and California standards.

Smog Check Sign

2014 and 2015 Dodge Ram 2500

Some of our clients have been told that the dealerships do not have a fix, and that they simply need to keep driving the truck – even after Recall S87 has been performed.

Dodge may be required to repurchase your 2014 – 2015 Dodge Ram 2500, and then also pay any legal fees.

Please contact Auto Fraud Legal Center for a FREE Case Evaluation.

Learn More

ATTENTION OWNERS OF FORD FOCUS AND FORD FIESTA

LINK TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT DOCUMENT

You are running out of time to act. Ford has settled a Class Action lawsuit involving the transmission in the 2012 – 2016 Ford Focus and 2011 – 2016 Ford Fiesta. The transmission is called Dual Power Shift 6-Speed (DPS6) or simply Power Shift. This settlement may significantly limit your rights and prevent you from getting even more money. You must act before September 5, 2017!

We believe that the transmission in the Ford Focus and Ford Fiesta has a defective design. We understand that Ford has attempted to repair the defective transmission by upgrading seals and replacing the clutches. We have also seen Ford replace the computer that controls the transmission, Transmission Control Module (TCM), as well as, the software.

Ford dealerships may have told you that the transmission is within “tolerance” or “specification.” Even if a dealer told this to you, we may be able to obtain a result for you that exceeds the payment contemplated by the Class Action settlement.

If you own a 2012 – 2016 Ford Focus or a 2011 – 2016 Ford Fiesta, please contact Auto Fraud Legal Center for a free evaluation of your rights. We are here to help you! We have been representing consumers in California for over thirty years.

September 5, 2017 is your deadline to act!

Learn More

Kim v. Premium Finance

Client was told the vehicle had been inspected and was in good condition. The vehicle actually had several leaks, and needed new brakes and sensors. Premium Finance also advertised a 3 month warranty and then failed to provide it at the time of sale.

Learn More

Duarte v. Ontario Volkswagen

Auto Fraud Legal Center has settled a case which required Ontario Volkswagen to buyback the subject vehicle. Our clients were sold a vehicle that had 2,000 miles on the odometer but the engine came from a salvaged vehicle with over 112,000 miles on it. The replacement engine was discovered 36,000 miles later. Ontario Volkswagen also failed to disclose the deferred downpayment on the contract.

Learn More

Seymour v. American Dream Auto Sales – Settled

Clients were not told the vehicle had accident and frame damage at the time of purchase. American Dream Auto Sales also overcharged license fees and failed to refund the overcharge.

Learn More

Thorns v. Colmex Auto Sales – Settled

Client purchased a vehicle that had not passed smog. Colmex Auto Sales also failed to repair the items on the Due Bill.

Learn More

New Suit Against John L. Sullivan Chevrolet and General Motors

Auto Fraud Legal Center filed a new case against John L. Sullivan Chevrolet and General Motors. In the lawsuit we allege John L. Sullivan Chevrolet improperly certified a wrecked vehicle, and lied about the accident when asked by our clients prior to sale. We also allege General Motors failed to provide any oversight and allowed John L. Sullivan Chevrolet to sell a damaged vehicle as Chevy CPO.

Have you also had problems with John L. Sullivan Chevrolet or General Motors? Call Auto Fraud Legal Center for a Free Consultation!

(800) 466-5366

Learn More

Douglas v. John Johnsons Cars; Fuentes Auto Sales, Inc.; Navy Federal Credit Union

Auto Fraud Legal Center has successfully settled a claim involving two dealerships and a credit union that collectively sold client a vehicle and failed to provide the title. After purchase, the bank continued to demand monthly payments for the vehicle while knowing that title had not been provided and that Fuentes Auto Sales was refusing to provide title unless it was paid an additional $10,000+.

Learn More
California's Auto Fraud Legal Center

Reach Out Now for Help!