Reach Out Now for Help!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Was the Car NEW, USED or CERTIFIED PRE-OWNED when you bought it?*
How do you use the car?*
MM slash DD slash YYYY
Did you finance the purchase with a loan?*
Did sign and were you given a copy of your credit application?*
If you financed the purchase, are you current with the payments?*
Do you still have the car?*

Pulliam v. HNL Automotive, Inc. & TD Auto Finance – Los Angeles County

We obtained a judgment against both HNL Automotive, Inc. (Hooman Nissan) and TD Auto Finance in 2018 and the Defendants appealed the award of attorney fees. Neither Defendant voluntarily paid the uncontested portions of the judgment—the obligation to refund our client’s money, with interest, and our litigation expenses. The Auto Fraud Legal Center went to work extracting our client’s money and the litigation expenses using the courts judgment enforcement tools. We are happy to report that TD Auto Finance has fully satisfied the uncontested portions of the judgment, including pre-judgment interest and post-judgment interest. The Court has now awarded our client an additional $48,000 against HNL Automotive, Inc. and TD Auto Finance for the attorney time and expenses incurred to force the Defendants to pay the judgment.

Free Case Evaluation
California's Auto Fraud Legal Center

Reach Out Now for Help!