Reach Out Now for Help!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Was the Car NEW, USED or CERTIFIED PRE-OWNED when you bought it?*
How do you use the car?*
MM slash DD slash YYYY
Did you finance the purchase with a loan?*
Did sign and were you given a copy of your credit application?*
If you financed the purchase, are you current with the payments?*
Do you still have the car?*

Hanna v. Mercedes-Benz USA – Published Opinion Against Mercedes-Benz

Rosner, Barry & Babbitt successfully reversed a lemon law attorneys’ fees ruling where the trial court in Los Angeles cut-off fees as of the date of an unacceptable Code of Civil Procedure Section 998 offer, and then misinterpreted the retainer agreement between Ms. Hanna and her counsel, awarding only $15,000 in fees for an entire year’s worth of litigation between the date of the invalid offer and the ultimate settlement. The trial court essentially rewarded Mercedes-Benz for making bad offers and taking so long to settle the case! In a published opinion, the Second District Court of Appeal found the trial court’s fee determination did not comply with the proper analysis for attorneys’ fees under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act and reversed and remanded the ruling with instructions.

If you have an appellate issue in a case involving the lemon law or auto fraud, contact arlyn@rbblawgroup.com for more information on how Rosner, Barry & Babbitt’s appellate department is helping consumers and attorneys confirm the good results and overturn the bad ones.

Free Case Evaluation
California's Auto Fraud Legal Center

Reach Out Now for Help!